Foresight GC2 vs Square Omni: Similarly Priced, but Very Different Launch Monitors

Watch a Quick Introduction to the Foresight GC2!

Sometimes, two launch monitors land so close together on price that comparing them isn’t much of a choice. It’s more like an obligation.

That’s the Foresight GC2 and the Square Omni.

The GC2 costs $1,699. The Omni costs $1,600. Both are camera-based. Both sit beside the ball. Both work indoors and outdoors. And both have a built-in screen so that you can get numbers right on the device during range sessions.

But beyond that, honestly, it’s more about differences than similarities with these two launch monitors.

The GC2 is Foresight’s bet on precision over quantity. It’s two cameras, ball data only, all directly measured data from the company whose launch monitors are found up and down every tour range. But no club data and a pretty decent subscription cost if you want to also play simulator golf.

The Omni is Square’s bet on everything. It’s four cameras, 21 metrics, ball and club data, face impact location, and no subscription. From a company that’s been in the launch monitor business for only a couple of years. But availability is an issue as backorder lines are still lengthy and the native sim software isn’t on par with competing devices.

I’ve spent a lot of time with both. One disclosure up front: I haven’t hit balls with the GC2 and Omni in the same session. But just know that I’ve used both devices extensively indoors and outdoors.

So which should you buy? Like other head-to-heads I’ve done, I’ve scored this matchup from 0 through 5 in 10 categories:

• Price
• First Impressions Upon Unboxing
• Setup Process
• Portability
• Data
• Outdoor Use
• Indoor Use
• Features
• Simulator Use
• Annual Subscriptions Cost

Pay the most attention to the categories that matter most to you. The total score matters less than you’d think.

Let’s get into the Foresight Sports GC2 vs the Square Golf Omni. 

Omni Beats GC2 on Price

Foresight GC2 = 3; Square Omni = 5

On paper, these two are separated by $99. But in practice, the gap is wider than that.

For $1,600, the Omni gives you four cameras, 21 metrics, face impact location, a built-in screen, and a GSPro connection with nothing owed to Square.

For $1,699, the GC2 gives you two cameras and eight measured ball metrics. Those are exceptional metrics, and I’ll get to why. But on a pure what-you-get-for-the-money basis, the Omni is in a different league.

I’m not docking the GC2 any further here for its subscription costs. Those get their own category at the end.

What I will say in the GC2’s defense is that price and value aren’t the same thing. A big part of what you pay for with Foresight is a build-quality and reliability track record nobody else in this price range can match.

Whether that’s worth $99 more for less data is pretty much the central question of this whole comparison. Let’s keep exploring.

Foresight GC2 Makes a More Premium First Impression

Foresight GC2 = 5; Square Omni = 4

 

 

Opening the GC2 feels like what it is. A Foresight product. It’s clean, minimalist packaging with the device front and center along with an alignment stick and power cord. And it’s just a premium first impression, mostly because you can see right away that the launch monitor itself is high quality and durable.

The Omni’s box has more in it. A folding tripod stand, a replaceable lithium-ion battery, an AC adapter, sheets of club and shaft stickers, a short alignment stick, and a card for 1,000 free credits in Square’s native software.

Interestingly, both boxes included some typos or misinformation. For the Omni, it was the word “Adoptor” instead of “Adapter” when referring to the power adapter. For the GC2, it was the inclusion of a picture on the box of an in-app experience that included club data, which doesn’t apply to the GC2.

The Omni hardware makes a great impression. It’s solid and substantial in hand, a massive step up from the original Square.

And the GC2’s new color screen, for its part, makes the Foresight GC3 look a little tired by comparison.

Nobody should buy either of these because of the box. But for the overall first-vibe win, I’m giving the edge to Foresight.

Easy Setup for Each, but GC2 Is Better

Foresight GC2 = 5; Square Omni = 4

 

 

Both of these launch monitors, being optical devices, sit to the side of the golf ball. And like all photometric options, setup is very easy relative to the more involved steps you’ve got to go through with a radar device that you’re trying to line up perfectly with the ball from behind.

And both the GC2 and Omni have the really cool addition of a reflective alignment stick that the launch monitor reads and that allows you to position your GC2 or Omni so that it’s perfectly aligned with your target. It works great with both products.

Also, pairing either the GC2 or Omni to another device is very fast and simple. Via either Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or Ethernet, connection to accompanying apps and software with both launch monitors was dead simple and happened automatically on subsequent sessions.

Where the GC2 becomes even simpler is that it’s got a built-in handle that makes transporting it and moving it that much easier. With the Omni, there’s no handle, and you’ve also got to install a tripod before you use it. Not a big deal, but it isn’t quite as instantaneous as with the GC2.

The Omni also requires you to put a reflective sticker on each club shaft as well as on every clubface if you want to get all of the data. The GC2 doesn’t require any stickers. But, of course, that’s because it’s not capable of giving you any club data. So we’re not really going to ding the Omni for the sticker issue. It’s similar to what you’d encounter if you stepped up to Foresight’s three-camera, club-data-capable GC3 model.

Still, because there are no legs to attach and it’s that much faster to get going with, the GC2 wins out narrowly in this category. Both are strong on setup.

GC2 Handle Wins Out on Portability

Foresight GC2 = 4; Square Omni = 3

 

 

Neither of these comes with a carrying case, which is a bit of a drag, especially because they both have built-in screens you don’t want to scratch.

But you feel the limitation of no carry case more with the Omni than the GC2 because the GC2 is one piece and because it has that built-in handle.

The Omni, with its tripod, kind of looks and feels like a larger version of a Rapsodo MLM2PRO. But whereas the MLM2PRO has an awesome case that makes transport really convenient, you don't get anything like that with the Omni.

Square Omni Impresses With All the Data

Foresight GC2 = 3; Square Omni = 5

This is the biggest difference between these two launch monitors. It’s not close on quantity.

The GC2 gives you just ball data:

• Ball speed
• Launch angle
• Launch direction
• Total spin
• Backspin
• Sidespin
• Tilt axis
• Carry distance
• Peak height
• Hang time
• Total distance
• Offline
• Descent angle
• Curve

The Omni gives you ball and club data:

• Ball speed
• Launch angle
• Launch direction
• Total spin
• Spin axis
• Backspin
• Sidespin
• Carry distance
• Total distance
• Descent angle
• Apex height
• Hang time
• Side carry
• Clubhead speed
• Smash factor
• Club path
• Angle of attack
• Face angle
• Face to path
• Dynamic loft
• Impact location

That’s a pro-level data set from the Omni. There’s nothing missing that a serious player, fitter, or coach is going to need.

But there’s a distinction worth slowing down for.

Foresight’s whole pitch here is that while they’re only offering ball data with the GC2, that’s not a limitation but instead a strength. And that’s because the accuracy of that data is irrefutable. It’s the same information trusted by tour pros.

And it is. I tested it directly against a GC3, and the GC2’s ball data was literally as close to identical shot after shot as you could possibly get.

But I also found the Square Omni to be unbelievably accurate. Yes, with the Omni, metrics like face angle and dynamic loft are calculated via an algorithm that’s factoring in the other data points rather than directly measured. Still, the Omni overall performed exceptionally well when it came to capture rate and accuracy. I also tested it directly against a GC3, and most readings were within a couple of yards, degrees, and mph.

And when you consider how much more data the Omni offers, for even less money than the GC2, it’s tough to argue against it.

On the other hand, the GC2 is giving you the most important numbers, directly measured, from a technology and brand that’s literally up to the standard of the world’s best players.

So while the Omni takes this category, that’s not a knock on the GC2’s accuracy. That part is unassailable. It’s just that the Omni is also very accurate, and it gives you much more information.

Foresight GC2’s Screen Better Than Omni’s for Outdoor Use

Foresight GC2 = 5; Square Omni = 4

 

 

Two huge wins for both of these launch monitors: They both read shots hit off of natural turf without any issue, and they both include a built-in display that allows you to use them without having to interface with another device if you don’t want to.

However, those built-in displays are not equal.

The GC2’s color screen is a first for Foresight. It’s crisp, it pops, and it’s optimized for sun and glare. It works well in bright sunlight. It’s small, and it’s not a touchscreen, but it cycles between two data views, and you can pick which metrics show up through the app.

The Omni’s screen shows six core metrics: ball speed, launch angle, launch direction, spin rate, spin axis, and carry distance. The numbers are big enough to read from your hitting position. The problem is the angle. Unless you’re really short, you’re looking down at numbers recessed into the face of the unit, and you have to squat down to see all of them head on. The labels for each metric are tiny, too. It’s not a total miss. But for a device selling itself on outdoor use, it definitely leaves a lot to be desired.

So, the GC2 takes this outdoor use category. It’s easier to read, easier to carry, and built like it’ll still be reading true years from now.

Both GC2 and Omni Provide Indoor Space-Saving Opportunities

Foresight GC2 = 4; Square Omni = 4

 

 

Both of these launch monitors sit beside the ball, which means neither needs the room depth that a behind-the-ball radar unit does. That’s a big deal for basement and garage sims where space might be tight.

The flip side, like with any side-mounted floor unit, is that you’ll have to move it when you switch between righties and lefties in the same session.

These two devices do differ a bit in terms of their hitting zones.

The GC2’s readable area is a trapezoid. You’ve got 4 inches across at the top of the zone, closest to the unit, 13 inches down the sides, and 14 inches at the bottom.

The Omni gives you a roughly 10-inch square starting a couple of inches from the unit, and you’ll get all of the ball data anywhere in it. For full club data, including impact location, the ball needs to sit in the front half, which effectively shrinks things to about 5x5.

Another point in both of these launch monitors’ favor is that you don’t need special golf balls to get any of the data. That said, with the Omni, you will need clubface and shaft stickers for the club data.

Square Omni Wins on Extra Features

Foresight GC2 = 3; Square Omni = 5

 

 

The Omni’s feature list is a big part of why it’s the most disruptive launch monitor of 2026.

Start with face impact location. In a camera-based unit at this price, with no add-on fee, that’s unheard of. And it’s very good. When the Omni got a clean read in my testing, the impact dot landed exactly where it should, and Uneekor’s Eye XO impact camera, which I used for comparison, backed it up again and again. It does have limits. I’d estimate as many as 20 percent of shots didn’t register a location at all, it’s only in the PC software and not the mobile app, and it doesn’t reliably work on high-lofted wedge shots.

Then there’s the putting. Square came out of the putting world as Exputt, and the Omni reads putts on the device down to light-touch tap-ins.

Another cool thing about the Omni’s design is that they recessed the cameras and screen so a golf ball can’t strike them.

The GC2 doesn’t try to compete on features. It’s a ball reader. And Foresight isn’t apologizing for that. They are basically saying, “you can now have the best-quality ball data at a lower price than you used to have to pay to get up to a GC3. Take it or leave it.”

That said, there are some nice touches with the GC2. The color screen and customizable tiles are nice. The automatic WiFi and Bluetooth connections are nice. And then there are the additional things like a virtual driving range, practice tools, sim course play, and swing video. But all of those things are buried behind a subscription, which keeps them from counting as the sorts of automatic features you get out of the box with the Omni.

Foresight’s Premier Courses Win Simulator Use, but GSPro Keeps the Omni Close

Foresight GC2 = 5; Square Omni = 4

The category of golf simulator use cuts both ways, and it’s where these two launch monitors make their most different arguments.

Foresight’s new Premier software rolls everything that used to be FSX Play, FSX 2020, and FSX Pro into one platform. And the sim courses, especially the collection of “Remastered” big-name tracks, are flat-out outstanding. Serious detail and graphic fidelity.

Square’s native software is on its 2.0 release, with a new Lodge driving range that includes a night setting, a refreshed Closest to the Pin game, and expanded putting practice. Some of it is a lot of fun. But even after the upgrades, it’s still the weakest part of the Omni package. The 22 included courses are fine but not exceptional, and they’re unfamiliar names. Square also doesn’t have a great track record when it comes to updates and support.

Here’s what evens it out. A huge number of Omni owners don’t care about Square’s software, because they never plan to use it. The Omni connects to GSPro and E6 Connect, with nothing owed to Square. So for the GSPro crowd, the Omni’s software weakness is mostly beside the point.

With Foresight’s GC2, if you want to play third-party simulator software like GSPro, you have to have at least the Gold Tier membership, which costs $600 a year. Throw in the $250 you’d have to pay annually to GSPro, and you’re looking at $850 a year to use a GC2 to play GSPro.

I’ll give Square credit for one more thing, which is its pay-as-you-go course play. Instead of a subscription, you spend a credit per hole. You get 1,000 free credits, which covers more than 55 solo 18-hole rounds. I think that’s a pretty cool model that allows users who aren’t playing as much to pay less.

Foresight gets the 5 here because, purely as a sim experience, Premier is a real reason to buy into that world. The Omni gets a 4 because GSPro gives it a world-class course library by extension for a lot less money.

Subscriptions Are Where the Omni Pulls Ahead

Foresight GC2 = 3; Square Omni = 5

Foresight has moved off one-time software purchases and onto a subscription model called Foresight+. Here’s how it shakes out for a GC2 owner:

• No subscription: Live data on the built-in display, plus 10 sessions of history in the app.
• Silver ($199/year): Data storage and tracking, plus the practice tools.
• Gold ($599/year): Everything in Silver, plus swing video and unlock for third-party software like GSPro.
• Course Pass ($295/year): 35 sim courses, including Quail Hollow, Muirfield, and Marco Simone.
• Course Pass Pro ($595/year): The full library of 110-plus courses, including Pebble Beach, Bethpage Black, Royal Troon, and the Olympic Club.

The catch is that neither course pass stands on its own. You need at least Silver to buy one. So sim golf using the new Premier software always means two subscriptions stacked.

Realistically, the golfer buying a GC2 to play simulated rounds is looking at Silver plus the basic Course Pass, which is going to run you $494 a year. And if you go all in, that’s nearly $1,200 a year.

And if you want GSPro, that requires Gold, which means it’s a minimum of $850 total a year.

Then there’s the Omni. No subscription. Not for the data. Not for face impact location, not for third-party software connection. If you want GSPro, you pay GSPro its $250 a year and that’s it.

To be fair to Foresight, its Premier courses are good enough that I think plenty of GC2 owners will be happy living in that ecosystem exclusively. But a launch monitor you’ll pay for every year for as long as you own it is a much different purchase than one you pay for once.

Adding Up the Scores for Foresight GC2 vs Square Omni

Which One Should You Buy?

Here’s how my 0-through-5 scores add up across all 10 categories:

Foresight GC2: 40

Square Omni: 43

The Omni wins if we’re going by overall score. It does more, it costs less, and you’re not paying annual subscriptions to Square.

But I meant it when I said the total number matters less than you’d think. Because the GC2 isn’t trying to win on totals.

The GC2 is for the golfer who demands precision and is OK accepting less quantity. Someone who wants directly measured ball data from one of the top-name brands in golf tech. That’s rightfully worth a premium to a lot of shoppers.

The Omni is solid and substantial, and I think it’ll prove durable. But Square hasn’t been at this long enough to have a track record, and its customer service reputation leaves some room for doubt.

There’s also availability. As of this writing, buying an Omni still means getting on a wait list.

But if you can wait, the Omni is for the golfer who wants every metric, including impact location. The golfer whose sim plans start and end with GSPro. The golfer who’s done paying launch monitor subscriptions year after year.

That’s a lot of golfers, which is exactly why the Omni has become the most disruptive launch monitor of 2026.

About PlayBetter Golf Reviewer Marc Sheforgen

Marc Sheforgen is a golf writer whose passion for the game far exceeds his ability to play it well. Marc covers all things golf, from product reviews and equipment recommendations to event coverage and tournament analysis. When he’s not playing, watching, or writing about golf, he enjoys traveling (often golf-related), youth sports coaching, volunteering, and record collecting.